John Dwyer, Vermont, 1756
John Dwyer and you may Jacob Blount bound by themselves to spend 50 weight so you can “our very own Sovering Lord King George another his Heirs and you may Successors” towards the 30 Get 1756, inside a marriage bond. The responsibility mentioned, “Brand new requirements from the duty you to whereas a wedding is supposed anywhere between John Dwyer and you will Jemina Enough time both of which county from Tyrrell aforesaid, Virgin woman, Today if there’s no lawfull trigger to help you impede the newest said wedding, then above obligation becoming emptiness…” nine
Joshua Farrell, Pennsylvania, 1785
Inside the 1785, Thomas Harrison, Currier, and you can Joshua Farrell, Mariner, of your own City of Philadelphia, inserted on the a thread because of the up coming matrimony regarding Joshua Farrell and you may Mary Anne McCartney. ten Although this record is technically toward the end of the newest Cutting edge Battle, will still be a pretty good exemplory instance of the fresh new colonial point in time ties.
“The condition of the obligation is such, that if there should maybe not hereafter arrive one lawful assist otherwise obstacle, by need of any Pre-price, Consanguinity, Affinity, or other simply End in anyway, but your significantly more than-said Joshua Farrell and you may Mary Anne McCartney, could possibly get legitimately Marry; which there is not any Match established before every judge, to have otherwise regarding the any such Pre-contract; and have should your told you Activities, and each of these, is actually of one’s complete Ages of Twenty-one Ages, and so are not according to the University fees from their particular Parents, otherwise feel the full Consent regarding his or her Moms and dads or Guardians correspondingly to the told you Marriage; and if they, otherwise both of them, aren’t indented Servants, and manage and you may should conserve harmless and maintain indemnified the aforementioned-stated John Dickinson Esquire…and shall while doing so save your self harmless and continue maintaining indemnified this new Clergyman, Minister, or Individual that should get in on the told you People from inside the Relationships, having, or of the Reasoning regarding his so undertaking; upcoming that it Duty is Emptiness and of none Impact, normally to stand in full Force and you can Virtue.”
In my look, I have seen several marriage bonds having my ancestors and you may research sufferers. That, eg, is the marriage regarding my partner’s next-great-grand-parents, Lewis Tharp and Joanna West.
Lewis Tharp and you will Joanna West was partnered when you look at the Fauquier Condition, Virginia within the 1805. The actual only real listing one remains of its wedding is the thread, which includes the newest concur away from Joanna’s father. Given that she was not yet , twenty-you to, their dad, John West, provided their authored permission. The fresh new bondsman is actually William hvordan mГёte lokale kvinner West, who was simply probably the sister out-of Joanna Western. eleven
George Tharp and you may Polly Noland, Virginia, 1801
Another type of bond I found whenever comparing the west relatives is actually the wedding bond from George Tharp and Polly Noland. The bond try dated a dozen January 1801 from inside the Fauquier County. John Western are brand new bondsman. twelve
I calculated there had been two relationships ranging from George Tharp and his bondsman, John West. Basic, John West are the new sibling out of Polly Noland. Polly’s mommy, “Gemime Noland,” provided their unique consent getting Polly to help you marry George Tharp, given that she wasn’t yet age 21. Jemima (Arnold) Noland is actually the brand new brother from Bathsehba Arnold, who was simply brand new partner off John Western. Jemima are widowed by the time Polly was married, that is most likely as to why buddy John Western was asked getting brand new bondsman.
The next connection between John West and George Tharp would be the fact John West repaid fees getting George Tharp inside 1799 and you will 1800. thirteen This may imply that George Tharp is employed by John West, possibly because an enthusiastic apprentice or servant. Men exactly who employed someone else was always guilty of paying the fees of these servants or apprentices. 14