The attempt populace had an average quantity of knowledge with the HPV regarding thirteen.six +/? 2.0 (95% CI 13.2–13.9) on the a measure from 20. There are high variations in studies with regards to the amount of knowledge (U = 425.5; p = 0.004). Background education towards the HPV is actually higher towards category with a high school-college degree compared to the elementary-zero knowledge. No differences in degree was in fact located because of age (U = 1442.0; p = 0.150) otherwise marital updates (U = 1450.0; p = 0.122).
The volume out of illness centered on HPV filters is shown in the Profile 2A. Of overall attempt people, 65.0% had been recognized as HPV self-confident which have 44.1% of your society identified become contaminated with high-risk HPV. Into set of people that have HPV, 75.6% regarding infections corresponded so you can a top-chance genotype and you may 74.3% of your people was recognized to have coinfections which have several HPV strains (forty-eight.3% from full sample inhabitants). Specific coinfected female shown as much as 8 different genotypes.
The remaining parameters incorporated: age at which the latest participant turned into sexually productive (X 2 = step three,234; p = 0
Figure dos. (A) Frequency studies of HPV illness in women based on amount of risk, Cuenca, Ecuador; 2019. n=120 lr (lowest risk)-HPV six, 11, 42, 43, forty-two, 81 (CP8304). ir (undetermined chance)-HPV twenty six, 34, forty, 54, 55, 57, 61, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 82, 83, 84. time (risky)-HPV sixteen, 18, 31, 33, thirty five, 39, forty-five, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68. (B) Regularity study off HPV illness in females centered on many years; Cuenca, Ecuador; 2019. n=120. (C) Volume analysis out of time HPV genotypes in females; Cuenca, Ecuador; 2019. n=120.
Whilst categories of female aged 56–65 and 30–45 yrs . old got increased ratio of HPV bacterial infections (Shape 2B), the fresh new Z test investigations getting proportion was unable to establish significant differences between age groups (p > 0.050). There’s no connection ranging from age groups and you may HPV issues (X dos = dos.746; p = 0.432).
The brand new regularity shipping of your own hrHPV stresses try found for the Figure 2C. The most prevalent genotype was hrHPV 18, followed by genotypes 52, 66, thirty five, and 51 (X dos = eight.234; p = 0.041). HPV 16 got a low volume out-of problems from the category learned.
step three.2. Modeling out-of HPV illness
Table 2. HPV disease based on Parity, Smoking practices, Amount of sexual couples, Birth-control and you will Immunosuppression episodes in women regarding Cuenca Ecuador, 2019.
If you find yourself total no association try discover ranging from HPV illness and you can condom explore, when accounting to possess marital updates, users have been unmarried or perhaps in common-law unions, condom have fun with try associated with the straight down infectivity (Fisher’s X 2 = 5.852; p = 0.026; V Cramer = ? 0.293; kissbrides.com buradaki web sitesine bir gГ¶z atД±n p = 0.016). Getting hitched women, it connection was not located (X dos = step 1.231; p = 0.412).
357), understanding of HPV (X dos = 0.261; p = 0.610), gynecological healthcare (X 2 = 0.141; p = 0.708), place of house (X dos = 0.369; p = 0.562), studies height (X dos = 0.188; p = 0.664), alcohol based drinks (X dos = 0.669; p = 0.413), age groups (X 2 = dos.033; p = 0.362), earlier STIs (X dos = 1.553; p = 0.276), volume out-of sexual intercourse (X 2 = 0.701; p = 0.441), and you will relationship reputation (X dos = step one.528; p = 0.250). They certainly were not of this HPV illness about attempt learned.
Binary logistic regression verified a link between parity, immunosuppression periods, use of oral contraceptives/IUDs, and you may confident HPV illness. All of those other parameters was in fact excluded along with their reduced statistical significance (p > 0.050) otherwise low predictive electricity with a non-significant Otherwise. No confounding otherwise communications details was in fact discovered. The features of your model obtained because of the binary logistic regression try revealed for the Table step 3.